Skip to main content

Disclaimer: Educational purposes only. Not legal advice. Consult a qualified NZ legal practitioner for your specific circumstances.

SimplifiedLaw.co.nz
employment

Unjustified Dismissal in New Zealand: What the Law Says

Key Takeaway

In New Zealand, an unjustified dismissal occurs when an employer's actions and the process followed for dismissal were not what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all circumstances. Both the reason for dismissal (substantive justification) and the fairness of the process (procedural justification) are assessed against this standard.

Unjustified Dismissal in New Zealand Employment Law

In New Zealand, an unjustified dismissal refers to a situation where an employer's decision to dismiss an employee, or the way in which that decision was made, does not meet the standard of what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances at the time the dismissal occurred [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(2)]. The burden of proving that the dismissal was justified rests with the employer [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(9)].

The Reasonable Employer Test

The reasonable employer test is the legal standard used to assess whether a dismissal or other action by an employer was justified. Under this test, the Employment Relations Authority (ERA), an independent body that deals with employment relationship problems, or the Employment Court must determine whether "the employer's actions, and how the employer acted, were what a fair and reasonable employer could have done in all the circumstances at the time the dismissal or action occurred" [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(2)].

This test is objective. It does not consider whether the ERA or the Employment Court would have acted in the same way as the employer, but rather whether the employer's actions were within the range of responses that a fair and reasonable employer could have adopted [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(2)]. In applying this test, the specific circumstances and facts known to the employer at the time are considered [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(3)].

Requirements for a Fair Process: Substantive and Procedural Justification

For a dismissal to be justified, it generally requires both substantive justification and procedural justification.

Substantive Justification

Substantive justification refers to the underlying reason or basis for the dismissal. This means the employer must have had a valid and genuine reason for ending the employment, such as serious misconduct, consistent poor performance, or a genuine redundancy [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(2)]. The employer's belief in the reason for dismissal must be genuinely held and based on facts or information available at the time [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(3)].

Procedural Justification

Procedural justification refers to the fairness of the process followed by the employer leading up to the dismissal. Even if a valid reason for dismissal exists, a failure to follow a fair process can render the dismissal unjustified [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(3)]. Key elements of a fair process typically include:

  • Informing the employee of concerns: The employee must be clearly informed of the specific allegations or concerns against them [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(3)].
  • Opportunity to respond: The employee must be given a reasonable opportunity to explain their side of the story or respond to the allegations [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(3)].
  • Consideration of response: The employer must genuinely consider the employee's explanation before making a final decision [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(3)].
  • Right to a support person: The employee should be informed of their right to have a support person present at any meetings where disciplinary action or dismissal is discussed [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(3)].
  • Thorough investigation: If allegations of misconduct are involved, a thorough and impartial investigation must be conducted by the employer [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 103A(3)].

Good Faith in Employment Relationships

The concept of good faith is fundamental to all employment relationships in New Zealand. It requires employers and employees to be active and constructive in establishing and maintaining a productive relationship [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 4(1)(a)]. This includes being responsive and communicative, and not acting in a way that is misleading or deceptive [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 4(1)(b)-(d)]. The duty of good faith applies throughout the entire employment relationship, including during any disciplinary or dismissal processes [Source: Employment Relations Act 2000, s 4].

When to Seek Independent Legal Advice

Individuals facing an employment dispute, particularly regarding a dismissal, should consider seeking independent legal advice. Information about employment law and dispute resolution processes can be obtained from official government bodies such as Employment New Zealand. For free legal advice, individuals can contact Community Law Centres.

Key Resources