Skip to main content

Disclaimer: Educational purposes only. Not legal advice. Consult a qualified NZ legal practitioner for your specific circumstances.

SimplifiedLaw.co.nz
disputes

Defamation disputes: Slander vs. Libel in NZ

Key Takeaway

In New Zealand, the distinction between slander (spoken defamation) and libel (written defamation) has largely been abolished. Defamation claims are primarily governed by the Defamation Act 1992. These types of disputes are typically handled by the District Court or High Court, rather than the Disputes Tribunal, due to the nature of the claims and the remedies sought.

Understanding Defamation in New Zealand

Defamation refers to the publication of a statement that causes or is likely to cause serious harm to a person's reputation [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 2(1)]. The law of defamation aims to balance freedom of expression with the protection of an individual's reputation.

Slander vs. Libel: The New Zealand Approach

Historically, defamation was divided into two categories: libel (defamation in a permanent form, such as writing) and slander (defamation in a transient form, such as speech). In New Zealand, this distinction has largely been abolished. The Defamation Act 1992 states that defamation consists of the publication of a defamatory matter, regardless of whether the publication is in permanent or transient form [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 4]. Therefore, for most practical purposes, a single body of law applies to all forms of defamatory communication.

What Constitutes Defamation?

To establish a claim of defamation, a plaintiff (the person bringing the claim) generally needs to show three key elements:

  1. Publication: The defamatory statement must have been communicated to at least one person other than the plaintiff [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 2(1)].
  2. Identification: The statement must refer to the plaintiff, either directly or indirectly [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 2(1)].
  3. Defamatory Meaning: The statement must have a defamatory meaning, meaning it would lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 2(1)].

Defences to Defamation Claims

The Defamation Act 1992 also provides several defences that a defendant (the person against whom the claim is made) may rely on, including:

  • Truth (Justification): If the defamatory statement is substantially true, it is a complete defence [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 8].
  • Honest Opinion (Fair Comment): If the statement is an expression of opinion rather than fact, relates to a matter of public interest, and is genuinely held, it may be a defence [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 9].
  • Privilege: This can be absolute privilege (e.g., statements made in Parliament or during judicial proceedings) or qualified privilege (e.g., statements made on an occasion where the publisher has a duty or interest to make the statement, and the recipient has a corresponding duty or interest to receive it) [Source: Defamation Act 1992, ss 13-18].

Jurisdiction for Defamation Disputes

Defamation claims in New Zealand are typically heard in the District Court or the High Court, depending on the complexity of the case and the amount of damages sought.

The Disputes Tribunal and Defamation Claims

Defamation claims do not generally fall within the jurisdiction of the Disputes Tribunal. The Disputes Tribunal is designed to resolve minor civil disputes relating to contracts, consumer issues, and property damage [Source: Disputes Tribunals Act 1988, s 10(1)].

Key reasons why the Disputes Tribunal is not the appropriate forum for defamation include:

  • Nature of Claims: The Disputes Tribunal's jurisdiction primarily covers claims for money, work, or the delivery of property [Source: Disputes Tribunals Act 1988, s 10(1)]. Defamation claims primarily concern damage to reputation, which is not a tangible good or service.
  • Monetary Limits: While the Tribunal can hear claims up to $30,000 (or $50,000 if all parties agree) [Source: Disputes Tribunals Act 1988, s 11], assessing damages for reputation can be complex and often exceeds these limits.
  • Remedies: The Disputes Tribunal cannot grant injunctions (court orders preventing further publication) or declarations (formal statements of legal rights), which are common remedies sought in defamation cases [Source: Disputes Tribunals Act 1988, s 18]. Its powers are generally limited to ordering payment of money, repair of property, or return of property [Source: Disputes Tribunals Act 1988, s 19].
  • Complexity: Defamation cases often involve complex legal arguments regarding meaning, context, and defences, which are better suited for higher courts with formal rules of evidence and procedure.

The Process in District or High Court

When a defamation claim is pursued in the District Court or High Court, the process typically involves:

  1. Filing a Statement of Claim: The plaintiff files a document outlining their claim, the defamatory statements, and the harm suffered.
  2. Defence: The defendant files a statement of defence, responding to the allegations and outlining any defences.
  3. Discovery: Both parties exchange relevant documents and information.
  4. Interlocutory Applications: Parties may make applications to the court on various procedural matters before trial.
  5. Trial: Evidence is presented, and witnesses are cross-examined before a judge (and sometimes a jury in the High Court for defamation cases, though this is rare) [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 24].
  6. Judgment: The court determines liability and, if defamation is proven, awards remedies.

Potential Remedies for Defamation

If a defamation claim is successful, the court may award:

  • Damages: Monetary compensation for harm to reputation, including general damages (for emotional distress and loss of reputation) and sometimes special damages (for quantifiable financial losses) [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 27]. Exemplary (punitive) damages may be awarded in exceptional cases to punish outrageous conduct [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 28].
  • Injunctions: An order preventing the defendant from further publishing the defamatory material [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 29].
  • Declarations: A formal statement by the court that the statement was defamatory [Source: Defamation Act 1992, s 29].

Costs of Defamation Proceedings

Litigating a defamation claim in the District Court or High Court can be expensive. Parties typically bear their own legal costs, although the court may order the losing party to contribute to the winning party's costs [Source: High Court Rules, Rule 14.1; District Court Rules, Rule 14.1]. This is in contrast to the Disputes Tribunal, where legal representation is generally not permitted and costs are minimal [Source: Disputes Tribunals Act 1988, s 41].

When to Seek Independent Legal Advice

Individuals involved in or considering a defamation claim should seek independent legal advice. A lawyer specialising in defamation law can provide guidance on the specifics of a case, including the likelihood of success, potential remedies, and the court process. Free legal advice may be available through organisations like Community Law Centres for eligible individuals [https://communitylaw.org.nz/].

Key Resources